12 August 1864 • San Francisco, Calif.
(Author’s copy and MS: CU-MARK and NPV, UCCL 10993)
. . . .
You have portrayed to me so often & so earnestly the benefit of taking frequent exercise, that I know it will please you to learn that I belong to the San F. Olympic Club, whose gymnasium is one of the largest & best appointed in the United States.1 I am glad, now, that you put me in the notion of it, Ma, because if you had not, I never would have thought of it myself. I think it nothing but right to give you the whole credit of it. It has been a great blessing to me. I feel like a new man. I sleep better, I have a healthier appetite, my intellect is clearer, & I have become so strong & hearty that I fully believe twenty years have been added to my life. I feel as if I ought to be very well satisfied with this result, when I reflect that I never was in that gymnasium but once in my life, & that was over three months [ago.] 2
[seven-eighths MS page (about 135 words) missing]
The place where my laugh comes in, though, is where a resident of Milton Place ‸San José‸ read that article & commented on it. He is one of these fellows who is impervious to humor, & he takes everything he finds in a [newspaper ]in dead earnest. Some fellow handed him that article just to see what he would say. (He lives alongside the house the rocket crashed through.) He read it with oppressive solemnity until he came to where the neighbors were expecting the man that went up with the rocket & moved their families out of his way, & then he threw down the paper & turned angrily to his friend & says he: “Moved their families out to give him a show! Was [expectin’ g ] of him down! Now look-a-here,3
Explanatory Notes | Textual Commentary
Source text(s):
Previous publication:
L1, 305–306.
Provenance:MS of the salutation and first paragraph probably acquired in the Moffett
Collection; see p. 462. See McKinney Family Papers, pp.
459–61.
Emendations and textual notes:
My • “My
ago. • ago.”
newspaper • news-|paper
expectin’ g • [possibly ‘expecti’ng’; apostrophe inserted above ‘n’. This ambiguous placement may foreshadow the reading ‘expect’n’ in the revision of the passage included in 13 and 14 Aug 64 to OC and MEC (308.8)]