Elmira, Aug. 9/82.
Dear Charley—
K. flourishes, better & better, but the monthly drain has always remained about the same since its earliest days. By the way—was the Slote note collected last month?—am hanged if I can remember now whether it was or not. How do the K accounts stand, now? Let Marsh send me a statement—not one of these damned incomprehensible professional-technical debtor-&-creditor enigmas, which none but godod & [book-keepers] can make head or tail of, but a plain sensible written-out statement of the case, which Jean can understand.
Look at the stamp on the “wWhite Elephant.” It is small, & perfectly simple—another sight simpler & smaller than the stamp which cost Osgood “probably” [$56]. Well, I am charged $45 for it—which I judge includes design—say $10. Now, do you imagine it would cost you $10 to cast that thing in brass spelter & then in brass? Why did your plate cost $28? Your part of the work did not cost you $3, if that famous Prince & P. picture cost you only $1. 50. [the following two sentences squeezed onto bottom of page:] Osgood will presently be in as a part owner, & he shall give his entire attention to that brass—for by God it shall succeed. I hear Orion is very sick with gastric fever.
I’m trying to cut my letter short, because I want to go to dinner—& yet I have lost a whole lot of time trying to squeeze it onto that sheet.
I like that big stamp—a gouge or two with a graver’s tool would perfect it. Suppose it did cost $28—it won’t cost $10 when I get the facilities together. I think the brass man charged the others $18 ‸or $20,‸ anyhow, for rent. God damn ‸Perdition catch‸ him, I shall call on him & ask him for statistics when I go to New York. Meantime, you ask him for them. It will puzzle the head entirely off his shoulders to explain that $25. Ten dollars for his work, $3 for yours—liberal sums, both. If he can explain the rest of the $28, raising the dead is foolishness to his talent. Inquire of him, Charley, for I am all impatience to know. And tell him to make his statistics simple & easy, for I want to take them to other founders for verification.
By ciphering-up on paper, & the higher-priced bindings, &c., shall we be able to show a four-thousand-dollar deficiency & on Bliss’s part, do you think? However, you’ll know better after you get those publishers’ estimates.
S L C
Textual Commentary
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d4f4/7d4f48cdb204d69463afb904696cc382f0313fc6" alt="glyph"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2040a/2040ae71785daa7db7de7bcbfe08d8d7daf71b07" alt="glyph"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2040a/2040ae71785daa7db7de7bcbfe08d8d7daf71b07" alt="glyph"
Previous publication:
MTBus, 193–94; MicroPUL, reel 2.
Provenance:
See McKinney Family Papers in Description of Provenance.
Emendations and textual notes:
book-keepers • book- | keepers
$56 • $ $56 [corrected miswriting]
Truly • [‘ly’ conflated]