27 June 1866 • Honolulu, Sandwich Islands
(MS: NPV, UCCL 00103)
‸P. S.—Now please don’t read this to anybody—I am always afraid to write to you—you always show my letters.‸
Honolulu, June 27, 1866.
My Dear Mother & Sister:
I enjoy being in the Sandwich Islands because I [don’t r]
[three-fourths MS page (about 80 words) missing]
& Gen. Van Valkenburgh, the United States Ministers to China & Japan say that California is proud of Mark Twain, & that some day America will be too, no [doubt.]
[four and three-fourths MS pages (about 530 words) missing]
tub, with a gill of water a day to each man. I got the whole story from the third mate & ten of the sailors. If my account gets to the Sacramento Union first, it will be published first all over the United States, France, England, Russia and Germany—all over the world, I may say. You will see [it. Mr. ]Burlingame went with me all the time, & helped me question the men—throwing away invitations to dinner with the princes & foreign dignitaries, & neglecting all sorts of things to accommodate me1—& you know I appreciate that kind of thing—especially from such a man, who is acknowledged to have no superior in the diplomatic circles of the world, & obtained from China concessions in favor of America which were refused to Sir Frederick Bruce & the Envoys of France & Russia until procured for them by Burlingame himself—which service was duly [acknowledged ]by those dignitaries.2 He hunted me up as soon as he came here, & has done me a hundred favors since, & says if I will come to China in the great first trip of the great mail steamer next January & make his house in Pekin hi my home, he will afford me facilities that few men can have [ then there ]for seeing & learning.3 He will give me letters to the chiefs of the great Mail Steamship Company which will be of service to me in this matter. I expect to do all this, but I expect to go to the States [first.—]& from China to the Paris World’s Fair.4
Don’t show this letter.5
Yrs affℓy
Sam.
P.S. The crown Princess of this Kingdom will be buried tomorrow with great ceremony—after that I sail in 2 weeks for California.
Explanatory Notes | Textual Commentary
came and put me on a stretcher and had me carried to the
hospital where the shipwrecked men were, and I never needed
to ask a question. He attended to all of that himself, and I
had nothing to do but make the notes. . . . We got through with this work at six in
the evening. I took no dinner, for there was no time to
spare if I would beat the other correspondents. I spent four
hours arranging the notes in their proper order, then wrote
all night and beyond it; with this result: that I had a very
long and detailed account of the Hornet episode ready at nine in the morning, while the
correspondents of the San Francisco journals had nothing but
a brief outline report—for they did
n’t sit up. The now-and-then schooner was to sail
for San Francisco about nine; when I reached the dock she
was free forward and was just casting off the stern-line. My
fat envelop was thrown by a strong hand, and fell on board
all right, and my victory was a safe thing. All in due time
the ship reached San Francisco, but it was my complete
report which made the stir and was telegraphed to the New
York papers. (SLC 1899, 77) Clemens’s scoop appeared on the front page of
the Sacramento Union on 19 July (SLC 1866 [MT00467], 1). No New York
printing of this report has been located, but a condensed version of it
did appear in the Stamford (Conn.) Advocate on 17
August (“The Hornet,” 2).
Source text(s):
Previous publication:
L1, 347–349; MTB, 1:285 and 287, brief excerpts and paraphrase; MTL, 1:108–9, with omissions; MTBus, 86, brief excerpt.
Provenance:see McKinney Family Papers, pp. 459–61. The cut-away parts were
probably already missing when Paine saw the MS, for he printed almost all
the surviving text but none of what is missing. In 1912 he quoted
‘California . . . doubt.’ (347.8–9) among
the excerpts in MTB, and in 1917, observing that “only a fragment”
of the letter then survived, he printed the bulk of the text from
‘with a gill’ (347.11) to the end in MTL. S. C. Webster introduced the fragment ‘Gen. . . .
doubt.’ (347.8–10) with the comment,
“Another letter to his mother has been largely cut away, probably
because a warning postscript says that it must not be shown to anybody. My
family, unfortunately, were very conscientious about following Uncle
Sam’s instructions” (MTBus, 86).
Emendations and textual notes:
don’t r • [The remainder of the leaf is cut away.]
doubt. • [The remainder of the leaf is cut away. The top of some character survives on the cut edge where the next line would have begun, indicating that ‘doubt.’, which falls at the end of a line, was not the end of a paragraph.]
it. Mr. • it.— |Mr.
acknowledged • ack- knonowledged [‘now’ over ‘know’]
then there • the‸re‸ n [‘re’ over ‘n’]
first.— • [dash over period]