per Telegraph Operator
8 February 1875 • (3rd of 3) • Hartford, Conn.
(Paraphrase: Salt Lake City Tribune, 9 Feb 75, UCCL 11986)
Being further peremptorily instructed, Messrs. Tilford & Hagan prepared and filed a bill in equity, in the Third District Court, for an injunction to enjoin the representation of “The Gilded Age” in this city. The case was heard before Chief Justice McKean, at Chambers, at half past five o’clock in the afternoon, Judge Sutherland resisting the application. After argument of counsel on both sides, the Court held, substantially, that upon the bill, as a matter of law, the plaintiff, Clemens, was entitled to be protected by injunction under the copyright statutes of Congress, whereupon it was ordered that a writ issue accordingly, which was done, with the result above stated.1 Mark Twain is ahead, and our next notice of “The Gilded Age” will be made when Raymond comes “Roughing It” to Salt Lake City, and then everybody can see that “There’s millions in it!”
Explanatory Notes
The legal gentlemen representing Mr. Clemens did all
in their power, consistent with Messrs. Sutherland &
Bates, to arrange the matter so that the piece could be played last
night, but it was claimed that the contract between Mr. John T.
Raymond and Mr. Clemens was such that neither party was at liberty
to dispose of the right to any one else; and so the
“Gilded Age” was not played last night, but
the management, determined that their audience should have some
“gilt,” put upon the boards in a few
minutes’ notice “All that Glitters is not
Gold.” (“An Injunction,” 9 Feb 75,
3) Gill was represented by Jabez G. Sutherland (formerly a
circuit judge in Michigan) and George C. Bates (the former United States
attorney for Utah). The case was heard before James B. McKean, the chief
justice of Utah Territory (Sloan, 249, 282, 301). The revised copyright
statutes of 1873 stated that “the circuit courts . . . shall
have power, upon bill in equity, filed by any party aggrieved, to grant
injunctions to prevent the violation of any right secured by the laws
respecting copyrights” (Solberg, 57).
Source text(s):
Previous publication:
L6, 375–376.