5 December 1872 • Hartford, Conn.
(Hartford Evening Post, 6 Dec 72, UCCL 11892)
to the editor of the post:1—Mayor Hall appears to be coming to the surface as frequently [&] as persistently, now, as if he had never been in disgrace & glad to hide his despised head. The hardihood of this creature is beyond comprehension. Out of a jury of twelve men, seven are of the opinion that he is an oath-breaker & a thief; all men, in their secret hearts believe him to be an oath-breaker & a thief. And one thing is certain—a long black list of robberies which he could have prevented by withholding his signature he did not so prevent. If he knew these bills were frauds, he was a knave; if he failed to know it, he was a fool. I wonder which character he prefers?2
Very well. When a distinguished English historian is coming over to visit us, who is it that pushes himself forward to receive him publicly? Longfellow?—Bryant?—Holmes? No—this precious Mayor Hall.3 When Stanley discovers Livingstone, England does him honor through some graceful personal attentions from the queen of the empire. When he arrives here do we vie with a foreign nation in appreciation of our citizen, & call upon the most exalted personage in the land to smoke a friendly cigar with him & say, “Well done, lad?” Oh, no—we take a pair of tongs & lead out our uncanny Mayor Hall & have him extend the people’s welcome.4 When the great editor dies & the nation mourns, do we select a gentleman to convey to the chief magistrate of the union the public desire that he shall honor himself & the dead with his presence at the funeral? Not at all. We permit our fragrant Mayor Hall, freely & unsnubbed, to crawl out of his sewer & insult the president of the United States, both in the language of the invitation & the source from whence it emanates.5
Just once, the people rose up & pushed this creature aside & saved us a national shame. Otherwise he would have stepped out from among the foul ring of New York thieves & offered the insult of his welcome to the son of an emperor who has always honored & befriended us. And it was fortunate for Mayor Hall that he was snubbed into inaction at that time; for the people were not in a patient mood, then, & if he had ventured to thrust himself & his speech upon the nation’s imperial guest his face would have become a public spitton in fifteen minutes by the watch.6
Is there no keeping this piece of animated putridity in the background? If the Second Advent shall transpire in our times, will he step forward, hat in hand, &——. But of course the man is equal to anything.
Yours truly,
M. T.
Hartford, Dec. 5.
Explanatory Notes | Textual Commentary
If he will take a walk to-morrow perhaps we will
get him up a few first-class street brawls. I have the authority of
The Tribune
for saying that street brawls on Sunday are very common.
[Laughter.] I may say in passing, and I believe it to
be so, Tribune or no, that there is no
such thing as murder in this city. We have street brawls and
homicides and misadventures, but old-fashioned grudge murder we hand
over to London and Boston. (“James Anthony Froude.
Reception by the Lotos Club,” New York Tribune, 14 Oct 72, 5) Members and guests at the reception included John Bigelow
(1817–1911), former U.S. minister to France; Samuel J. Tilden
(1814–86), chairman of the New York State Democratic
Committee; David G. Croly of the New York World;
William C. Church of the Galaxy; Edward
Eggleston; Bret Harte; John Hay; Josiah Holland; Joaquin Miller; and
Edmund Yates. On 29 October the New York Times
referred to the occasion: The manager of the Tribune
[Whitelaw Reid] and Mayor Hall were the principal
“speakers” at a thing called a
“reception,” recently foisted upon Mr. Froude
at an obscure “club” in this City. Hall and
Greeley’s representative are samples of Reformers on the
Greeley-Fenton pattern. Probably Mr. Froude never found himself in
such company before, but he is expert at whitewashing, and he will
have plenty of room for his skill in the objects which he met at the
“club” alluded to.
(“‘Reform,’” 1) Reuben E. Fenton (1819–85), U.S. senator from New York, was
one of the leaders of the anti-Grant faction. The Times’s allusion to Froude’s skill at
“white-washing” probably referred to his
appreciative portrait of Henry VIII in the History of
England from the Fall of Wolsey to the Death of Elizabeth (12
vols., 1856–70), and to the opinions he expressed in his most
recent work, which were seen as an attempt to vindicate
England’s policies toward Ireland (Dunn, 2:266–70, 370–87; New
York Tribune: “New-York
City,” 10 Oct 72, 8; Elderkin, 11–12, 18–20;
Cortissoz, 1:235–36;
Paine 1904, 208; see also 1 Feb
73 to Reid, n. 2).
Having the honor of your personal acquaintance,
I telegraph you to say that the civic authorities will join the
private societies and citizens in a public funeral on Wednesday,
from the City Hall, to the late Mr. Greeley, and the idea is
universal that should the President attend, and the authorities
hereby respectfully invite him, his attendance would popularly be
regarded the most magnanimous, graceful, and faction-assuaging event
of the country. Robeson replied the next day that President Grant had decided to attend
the funeral even before receiving Hall’s telegram
(“The President to Attend the Funeral,” New York
Tribune, 3 Dec 72, 1).
Source text(s):
Previous publication:
L5, 244–247.
Emendations and textual notes:
& • and [here and hereafter]