3? July 1869 • Elmira, N.Y.
(Paraphrase: OC to MEC, 7 July 69, CU-MARK, UCCL 11698)
I have been writing at some length to Sam, in answer to one received yesterday, in which he said Mr. Langt don offered $20,000 ‸cash‸ and $10,000 canal stock for our land.1 . . . Sam wrote that he wanted a quiet place to write his next winter’s lecture2
Explanatory Notes
I am much pleased with Mr. Langdon’s
offer; but as you suggest, he must not buy blindfold, or until he
sends his Memphis agent there to examine. Neither you nor Ma nor
Pamela know anything about the land. ... I have laboriously
investigated the titles, localities and qualities, and I would put
its present value at about five thousand dollars, though Ma and
Pamela would not be willing to take that. . . . The difficulties are
that Tennessee grants the same land over and over again to different
parties if they apply for it, leaving them to fight out among
themselves questions of priority of entry and compliances with the
provisions of the laws, and will then give it with a better title
than all of them to some stranger with seven years possession under
a deed from some person having himself absolutely no shadow or
pretense of title. Orion proposed trying to perfect the family’s title by leasing
the land in “160 acre tracts and settling immigrants on them
with seven or eight years’ leases. . . . How would it do to
propose to Mr. Langdon an equal copartnership—we to furnish
the land and he the means to colonize?—Provided we make no
other disposition of the land before next April, as, until that time, it
is locked up in the hands of Merriman & Co.” And
he closed by reiterating the terms of his agreement with the St. Louis
land agents, which Jervis Langdon had found questionable: “If
Merriman & Co. sell for a dollar an acre, we give them 5 pr
ct. If they sell for over a dollar we give them half of all over,
provided their commission shall not be less than 5 pr ct.”
(CU-MARK). Langdon’s
response to Orions’s “equal
copartnership” proposal is not known. In November 1869,
Clemens declined to involve him in any sort of purchase, although he
agreed to approach him about mining the coal on the land (see 9 Nov 69 to
PAM).
Source text(s):
Previous publication:
L3, 279–280.
Provenance:see Moffett Collection, pp. 586–87. Samuel Clemens’s
original letter may have been destroyed in 1904.