the arlington.
washington, d. c. Sept. 8 1871
Livy darling, the invention business looked dark enough this morning (& the clouds are not all gone yet.) By a small stretch of the law which says “The Patent Office cannot respond to inquiries as to the [novelty ] of an alleged invention in advance of an application for a patent,” the Patent officers have thrown open everything to me and shown me every document & drawing that bears any relationship to my invention.1 (But that you may keep to yourself, honey.) Therefore, I know what to claim as my idea, & what to leave unclaimed as having originated with somebody else. It makes plain sailing. Been at work at this ferreting business all day long in the Patent Office. At first it seemed that not less than six different people had already patented my invention (one man 33 years ago;) but by closely scanning all the documents we found that not one of them had got a patent for the chief virtues claimed in mine. So I may possibly get a patent, but it will not be so broad & general in its nature as I had hoped for. But still I may get none at all; because access cannot be had to European patent records yet awhile, & so, a few weeks or months hence it may transpire that some foreigner is ahead of me.
But I’ll have to run, or I’ll get no dinner. Am so glad to hear you & the cubbie are improving.
Ys Lovingly
Samℓ.
Mrs. S. L. Clemens | Care Langdon & Co. | Elmira | N. Y. [return address:] return to j. langdon & co., elmira, n. y., if not delivered within 10 days. [postmarked:] [washington] d.c. sep 8 2
Explanatory Notes | Textual Commentary
Source text(s):
Previous publication:
L4, 453–454; LLMT, 361, brief paraphrase.
Provenance:see Samossoud Collection in Description of Provenance.
Emendations and textual notes:
novelty • novlelty
washington • wash [ig]ton [badly inked]