“MORE WISDOM.” 1
“They that go down to the sea in ships, see the wonders of the deep;”2 and they that buy coal mines in Pennsylvania and work them see wonders likewise.
They see the wonder of finding themselves suddenly stripped of their independence and converted into the servants of their own employés.
They learn to come and go, do and undo, bow and scrape, simper, smile, shuffle and smirk, at the behest of the “Miners’ Union.”3
They enjoy the wonder of seeing orderly men murdered and little or no notice taken of it by Pennsylvania law officers sworn to execute the statutes, but who prefer perjury to unpopularity, apparently.
They enjoy also the wonder of seeing a legislature lavish all its solicitude upon the miner, without seeming to reflect that his employer has a soul to save too.4
They enjoy, finally, the spectacle of a legislature delivering into the hands of an irresponsible mob the actual control of property belonging wholly to their employers.
Such are some of the wonders these men see. The secret of it all lies in the fact that the members of the Miners’ Union are a political power. They have votes, and therefore legislatures must not offend them nor petty officers see the small indiscretions which they commit with scalping knife and Deringer.5
But the latest wonder is a certain thing which has just become a law in Pennsylvania. It is, that every mine shall be under the control of three persons, whose prerogative it shall be to order alterations in the manner of opening or working it, and who shall also close up and stop work upon such mine when in their discretion it shall seem proper to do so. And who appoints these autocrats? The owners of the mine? No. Their employees do it. 6
Nothing need now be deemed impossible to a Pennsylvania legislature.
And who is it into whose hands the legislature has given this high appointing power? Simply an irresponsible society of men who hold meetings, pass laws, and enforce them by the agencies of terrorism and blood. When a man goes to work in a colliery tabooed by the Miners’ Union, they stick a notice on his door-post suggesting that he resign his situation with all convenient dispatch—and they emphasize this suggestion by printing at its top the sign of a coffin.
That these “coffin notices,” as they are called, are not inspired by empty bravado, may be gathered from the following telegram, dated Shamokin, March 5, and signed by an old and respectable resident of that locality:
“Luke Fidler colliery was going to work without the Union. The ‘Mollie McGuires’ of the Union men murdered the watchman. Three superintendents in one colliery in [Shamokin] have been murdered since the troubles in the coal mining districts began, and nothing done about it.”7
These are the sort of people who are to choose three absolute sovereigns to preside over each mine. These are the people for whose “protection” the Pennsylvania legislature is straining itself to provide. It seems an unnecessary courtesy while ammunition is so cheap.
After saying so much about it, do we suggest a remedy? A remedy for secret assassination; for blind and deaf and dumb officers of justice; for mob terrorism; for truckling legislatures? No; there is no remedy for these things. That is, no remedy that can be brought into instant use. There is one, but time is required for it. It applies itself, and is simply that remedy which comes to the relief of all disorder, viz: the teaching of reason and fair dealing to all parties concerned, through the convincing agencies of hardship, disaster and weariness of fighting each other.
However, should the Pennsylvania legislature take the only step now left it to take for the “protection” of those persecuted lambs, the miners, and make them absolute, joint and equal owners with the present nominal proprietors of the collieries, it is fair to presume that the millenium of peace and order in that Pandemonium8 would be greatly hastened. Until then, let us continue, as is usual and proper, to wail for the poor oppressed and [down-trodden ] miner, whose only solace, in this cold world, is putting up his little “coffin notice” on his neighbor’s door and then helping to get him ready for the funeral.
Explanatory Notes | Textual Commentary
Widespread violence and the equally widespread notion of a secret society called the Molly Maguires forced the popular equation
of the two. In the resulting milieu there was an excellent outlet for pent-up frustration. It is easy to conceive of a person who,
denied institutional outlets, found an outlet for his anger by evoking the Mollies. It was simple: one sent an anonymous note
emblazoned with a pistol or coffin and promising vengeance on the recipient. Superintendents and foremen were the most likely
targets in the anthracite regions. Men in managerial positions throughout the nation received similar warnings, but only in the
Schuylkill and Lehigh anthracite regions did popular opinion make the receipt of a “coffin notice” a fearful
experience. The number of “coffin notices” sent to managerial personnel was sufficient to complete a
relationship in which violence equaled Molly Maguires and Molly Maguires equaled labor unions. Calmer minds, however, could not grant the equation of the Molly Maguires and organized labor. The amount of
violence actually declined during the period of the Workingmen’s Benevolent Association’s greatest strength.
(Aurand 1971, 98–99; see also Long, 110–13)
Source text(s):
Emendations and textual notes:
Shamokin • Skamokin
down-trodden • down-|trodden