Elmira, Sept. 1 2.
My Dear Howells:
Your telegram just rec’d. Shall await your letter.1
But I made a mistake in writing you. It would take too long to explain. Suffice it that I was charging about 33 per cent more than I meant to.
This disgusts me. But I send the “Fable for Old Boys & Girls” anyway. Since its price is lowered I don’t know but what you might really come to like it. But hurl it back with obloquy if you don’t. I can dodge.
I enclose also a “True Story” which has no humor in it. You can pay as lightly as you choose for that, if you want it, for it is rather out of my line. I have not altered the old colored woman’s story except to begin it at the beginning, instead of the middle, as she did—& worked ‸traveled‸ both ways.2
I told this yarn to Hay & some company & they liked it. So I thought I’d write it.3
Ys Ever
Mark.
[enclosure:] 4
[on the back:]Do you mind that attitude? It took me hours to perfect that.
Explanatory Notes
Howells answered Clemens’s letter of 22 August and a letter written about a week
later, now lost but alluded to in Clemens’s second paragraph. When he received it, Howells was packing for his family’s
Saturday, 29 August, return to Cambridge from their summer quarters in Jaffrey, New Hampshire (Howells 1979, 66). For Charles Pope’s response to the translation Howells finished sending him that same
day, see note 4. Howells’s letter did not reach Clemens for four months: the postmarks on its envelope indicate that it arrived
in Elmira on 3 January 1875, whereupon Theodore Crane readdressed and remailed it to Hartford. Howells’s joke about Sir Walter
Scott (“the Waverley man”) has not been explained.
He came first with
“A True Story,” one of those noble pieces of humanity with which the South has atoned chiefly if not solely through him
for all its despite to the negro. . . . “A True Story” was but three pages long, and I remember the
anxiety with which the business side of the magazine tried to compute its pecuniary value. It was finally decided to give the author
twenty dollars a page, a rate unexampled in our modest history. I believe Mr. Clemens has since been offered a thousand dollars a
thousand words, but I have never regretted that we paid him so handsomely for his first contribution. I myself felt that we were
throwing in the highest recognition of his writing as literature, along with a sum we could ill afford; but the late Mr. Houghton, who
had then become owner and paymaster, had no such reflection to please him in the headlong outlay. He had always believed that Mark
Twain was literature, and it was his zeal and courage which justified me in asking for more and more contributions from him, though at
a lower rate. (Howells 1907, 601) For
Howells’s 1875 assessment of “A True Story” and the “confusion” it caused in the “average
critical mind,” see pp. 657–58. For Houghton, see 11
Dec 74 to Houghton and Company, n. 1.
Clemens had praised A Foregone Conclusion in his letter of 21 June to Howells. The fable evidently was not his
first failure with the Atlantic. Around mid-December 1874 he told Joseph H. Twichell that “the first two
pieces he sent to the Atlantic were rejected” (Twichell, 1:38). The
earlier unsuccessful piece has not been identified. Howells was doubtless correct in thinking the fable too indelicate for the
magazine’s readers. Published as the three-part “Some Fables for Good Old Boys and Girls” in Sketches, New and Old in 1875, it depicts a scientific expedition in which the ludicrous researchers are an assortment of animals
and insects who misinterpret their findings, get drunk, and are repeatedly irreverent. This printed version, typeset from a manuscript
now at the New York Public Library (NN-B), does not explicitly mention Sisyphus
and Atlas, but does have its Tumble-Bug observe that he comes “of a race that rolled their fragrant spheres down the solemn
aisles of antiquity” (SLC 1875, 139). Clemens did not add any
“circumstantiation” to “A True Story” (see 20 Sept 74 to Howells, n. 1). The missing photograph of the “whole landscape” may have been an
exterior view of Clemens’s study identical to the one enclosed in the next letter. The “asthma” photograph has not
been identified. Howells’s “dispoged” echoes Sairey Gamp in Dickens’s Life and Adventures
of Martin Chuzzlewit, a book Clemens knew well. Charles Pope had written to Howells on 4 September, expressing his satisfaction
with Howells’s work: “I could wish for nothing better, and I believe no one could have done it better” (Howells 1979, 64 n. 3; MTHL, 2:863; L1,
104–5, 112, 190, 193; L5, 490).
Source text(s):
Previous publication:
L6, 217–20; MTB, 1:514, and MTL, 1:223, excerpts from letter; MTHL, 1:22-23, 25 n. 3, without photograph.
Provenance:See Howells Letters in Description of Provenance for the letter. The photograph was donated in 1945 by Mildred Howells and John
Mead Howells.