Feb. 25.
Dear Mother:
Now you talk! We shall look for you & long for you & hunger for you till you come. We shall have the serenest & happiest time while you are here, & nobody shall know care or fatigue. As for the date of your coming, we could not have chosen ‸it‸ better by any possibility than you have done—unless, perhaps, we chose that you get here the middle of March instead of to [Philadelphia. You ] see, we want you with us a good big liberal time, & we can’t have that if you fool away too much of March in transitu, because we begin to break up here the 15th or 16th of April to go to Elmira about May 1. We shall be mighty glad to see Charley, we can promise that.1
[first thirteen lines of page (about 52 words) cut away to cancel] 2
If I could get John Hay to Hartford & in our neighborhood, I would actually have nothing more to desire in the world—except your’s & David Gray’s presence here too.3
You want to know what I am doing? I am writing two admirable books—I like a good strong adjective—& you shall claw them to pieces & burn the MS when you come.4 However, Livy is in hearty sympathy with both of these books—& you & she are my severest critics. I have written a 5-act play, with only one ‸(visible)‸ character in it—only one human being ever appears on the stage during the 5 acts—but the interest is not in him but in two other people who never appear at all. It may never be played—but you shall read it—it is at least novel & curious.
I have another play in my head which ought to be singularly powerful if I can get it out of my head ‸the matrix‸ without breaking it. I will tell you about it when you come. Maybe I’ll have written [it] by that time.5
Allso, I am preparing several volumes of my sketches for publication, & am writing new sketches to add to them.6
I am the busiest white man in America—& much the happiest.
I think you don’t like the Gilded Age,—but that’s because you’ve been reading Warner’s chapters. I wrote chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 24, 25, 27, 28, 30, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 42, 43, 45, first three or four pages of 49,—also chapters 51, 52, 53, 57, 59, 60, 61, 62, & portions of 35 & 56. You read those! 7
The Modoc has just tumbled down again & smashed some more furniture—& herself. I hear an angel sing, maybe, but there’s other tunes I prefer.
Lovingly, from both of us,
Samℓ.
Explanatory Notes | Textual Commentary
move into his new house on Farmington avenue on the
1st of May. He now occupies the dwelling house of Mr. John Hooker on
Forest street, which by an advertisement in our columns to-day Mr.
Hooker offers for rent for another year, as he expects to go abroad
with his family in May. The house is one of the most desirable in
the city both in itself and in its neighborhood. (“Local
Notices,” 1) Hooker’s advertisement mentioned that the
house was “now occupied by Mr. Samuel L. Clemens”
(“New Advertisements—Real Estate,” 2).
In fact the Clemenses did not intend to occupy their Farmington Avenue
house until after their return from Elmira, in the fall of 1874. They
left for Elmira on 15 April, two weeks sooner than planned. In March and
April, Mrs. Fairbanks and her son, Charles—now nearly
nineteen and on an end-of-term break from his studies in Hudson, Ohio
(L5, 52 n. 3)—traveled together in the East. Charles
discussed his visits to Washington, Philadelphia, and New York in two
“Here and There” columns published in the
family’s Cleveland Herald on 1 May and
3 June (Charles Mason Fairbanks, 1874 [bib13487], 1874 [bib13488]). Mother, and presumably son, also visited Hartford in
April, possibly just before the Clemenses left for Elmira, which they
reached as usual by way of New York City. The Fairbankses and Clemenses
must have left Hartford for New York almost at the same time, for they
dined together there on 15 or 16 April (see 18 Apr 74 to Gray, n.
2). While Mrs. Fairbanks was in Hartford, the
Clemenses’ architect, Edward Tuckerman Potter, escorted her
on a tour of the house, which she described in a long letter to the Herald written under her pen name,
“Myra” (L2, 166 n. 4), and published on 4 May. She described the Forest
Street residences of the Clemenses and the Charles Dudley
Warners—“two houses that look out modestly but
invitingly from the trees and hedges that seem to caress
them”—and gave a detailed account of the new house
Clemens was building, rebutting newspaper correspondents who assumed
that “Mark Twain’s house must, of course, be
‘a joke,’ consistent with himself”: The house stands upon Farmington avenue, and is an attractive
combination of dark red brick, set off by light graceful wood work
about the windows and balconies. It is planted as it were upon the
bank of a dell at just the right angle to take in through its broad
windows the loveliest of views of river, meadow, glen, and woodland.
The visitor who accuses Mark Twain of disrespect to the avenue in
putting the kitchen in front misleads you, although the humorous
proprietor would justify such an arrangement on the ground that it
would make his servants cheerful if they could overlook the funerals
and St. Patrick’s processions, while he would choose to
gaze from his library windows upon the dainty pictures which nature
will paint for him in all the colors of the changing seasons. Once
more I am reminded that I cannot “draw a
house,” but I can give you the benefit of my tour of
inspection through its numerous rooms, under the escort of the
architect, Mr. Edward L. Potter, of New York. I hardly know which
most impressed me, Mr. Potter’s power in his art or his
love of it. He gave me no detail of height or breadth, but in the
quick effects which he helped me to discover I recognized the artist
capable even of enthusing me, novice as I was, with a new interest
in the wonderful science of architecture.
“Here,” said he, as we stood in the main hall
from which opened parlors, library, and dining-rooms,
“here we must produce pleasant effects, so here we put
this fire-place, which shall have its antique tiles and its polished
andirons. Over the mantel we have put a window opposite, and yet
more, the outer landscape of Farmington Avenue and the country
beyond.” Could anything be more charming? The arrangement
of library and dining-rooms are simply bewitching. Indeed adjectives
begin to fail me. The rooms open into each other with folding doors.
At the end of the dining-room is a fire-place with a window over the
mantal commanding the same avenue view. On the side a broad window
looking down upon the river and its pretty bank and meadow. At the
rear of the Library is a Conservatory opposite the fire-place of the
dining-room. Imagine the winter attractions of these rooms, while
the summer charms are not less apparent. A generous bay window in
the side of the library lets in a whole sweep of rich landscape and
a fire-place on the opposite side is surmounted by a quaint oaken
mantel of ancient English carving. Opening from the Library is a
suite of rooms whose tasteful appointments and dainty boudoir
indicate their presiding genius. Up the broad, easy stair case, which seems, somehow, not to encroach
upon the spacious hall, we follow our friend Mr. Potter, who peoples
and embellishes the second floor for us. Here is the nursery with
its gay hangings, it[s] bright carpet, its fantastic,
story-telling tiles beside the fire place. Here are windows that
take in a flood of early sunshine and perfume of the violets that
grow on the bank beneath—and music of the
robins—the cheeriest room in the house for a child to
thrive and delight in. This door opens into the mother’s
little parlor—that into the father’s study. Here are guest rooms, opening upon balconies that command landscapes
to inspire a poet or an artist—and that reminds me that
on the third floor is a room so charming in its lookout as to be
already devoted to the “artist friend” whoever
he may chance to be. Adjoining this, is another room, in which you
may look for the “author” when you find the
study vacant—a billiard parlor with verandahs that look
like turrets, from which to study the movements of the enemy. (Mary
Mason Fairbanks) For the sort of account Mrs. Fairbanks hoped to correct,
see 4 Feb 74 to Cox, n. 3.
“The Gilded Age,” which professes to be
“a tale of to-day,” is the joint production of
“Mark Twain” and Charles Dudley Warner. It is
a biting satire on the men and principles—or absence of
principle—of the age, and contains some highly dramatic
incidents and bits of good descriptive writing, but it is not what
we had reason to expect from two authors of such unquestionable
talent as Mr. Clemens and Mr. Warner. The irresistible drollery of
the “Innocents Abroad” finds but the faintest
kind of reflection in “The Gilded Age.” The
delicious mingling of genial humor and shrewd wisdom in
“Back Log Studies” is nowhere perceptible in
this bigger book. The hand of “Mark Twain” is
visible here and there, but the most skilful literary detective
would fail to place his finger on a passage which he could
confidently assert to be Warner’s. It is a book from
which the authors will doubtless derive present profit, but it will
not add to the literary reputation of either. At the same time the
book has positive merits of its own. It fearlessly lashes the frauds
and humbugs who occupy prominent places in all ranks of society and
in all positions of honor and profit. There is no mercy for such
offenders. The mask of pretended piety and robe of assumed honesty
are stripped off and the rascals exposed to the lash of the satirist
and the scorn of the world. But, admitting this, it is not the work
in which Messrs. Clemens and Warner feel most at home and in which
their friends enjoy their company best. “The Gilded
Age” is copiously illustrated. It is sold by
subscription, the agents for this part of the country being Messrs.
Bliss & Co., Toledo. (“Concerning
Literature,” 2)
Source text(s):
Previous publication:
L6, 46–50; MTMF, 182–84.
Provenance:see Huntington Library in Description of Provenance.
Emendations and textual notes:
Philadelphia. You • Philadelphia.—|You