Jump to Content

Add to My Citations To Edmund H. Yates
4 August 1873 • Edinburgh, Scotland
(MS: CU-MARK, UCCL 10703)
Click to add citation to My Citations.

Veitch’s Hotel
em spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceem spaceEdinburgh, Monday.

}

My Dear Yates:1

I am sincerely grieved to see that the Herald people have added a paragraph to one of my letters which puts me in a bad light. They describe me & the London correspondents as cheering the Shah at Ostend & conducting ourselves in anything but a proper way. It was a careless thing in the Herald people to do, after the kindly & gentlemanly way in which those correspondents [treated] me on board the Lively.2

Whenever you meet one of those correspondents, I would wish you would do me the real kindness to explain this thing to him & say that I am as sincerely grieved about it as if I had done the deed [myself. And] in truth it has worried me more than I could tell in many pages of manuscript.

I don’t think Hosmer could have done that. His [ im ] instincts would have been truer, I think.3

Ys Faithfully

Sam. L. Clemens.

Explanatory Notes | Textual Commentary

Add to My Citations

Click to add citation to My Citations.
1 See 17 or 18 June 73 to Young, n. 1. After seeing Clemens at Ostend in June, Yates had reported for the Herald on the shah’s July visit to Paris, then made a quick trip to England: on 2 August he was in London. Shortly thereafter he returned to Vienna to report on the rewarding of prizes in the International Exhibition (Yates: 1885, 412; 1873, 10).

Add to My Citations

Click to add citation to My Citations.
2 The offensive remark was inserted into Clemens’s first letter on the shah, which was published in the New York Herald on 1 July, but which he had only just seen in print (see 2 Aug 73 to Bliss [2nd] ):

The Shah walked back alongside his fine cabin, looking at the assemblage of silent, solemn Flounders; the correspondent of the London Telegraph, was hurrying along the pier and took off his hat and bowed to the “King of Kings,” and the King of Kings gave a polite military salute in return. This was the commencement of the excitement. The success of the breathless Telegraph man made all the other London correspondents mad, every man of whom flourished his stovepipe recklessly and cheered lustily, some of the more enthusiastic varying the exercise by lowering their heads and elevating their coattails. Seeing all this, and feeling that if I was to “impress the Shah” at all, now was my time, I ventured a little squeaky yell, quite distinct from the other shouts, but just as hearty. His Shah ship heard and saw and saluted me in a manner that was, I considered, an acknowledgement of my superior importance. I do not know that I ever felt so ostentatious and absurd before. (SLC 1873)

Add to My Citations

Click to add citation to My Citations.
3 George W. Hosmer (1830–1914), a practicing physician as well as a noted journalist, reported for the New York Herald during the Civil War and the Franco-Prussian War. As the London correspondent for the Herald he had supervised Clemens’s assignment to report on the shah’s visit (Joseph J. Mathews, 80; “Dr. George W. Hosmer Is Dead,” New York Times, 14 June 1914, 11; see 2 Aug 73 to Bliss [2nd], n. 1).



glyphglyphSource text(s):glyph
MS, Mark Twain Papers, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley (CU-MARK).

glyphglyphPrevious publication:glyph L5, 430–431; Waiting for Godot Books, item 6, with omissions.

glyphglyphProvenance:glyphThe MS, owned at an unknown date by Raphael King (London) and in 1969 by Paul H. North of Second Life Books (Columbus, Ohio), was purchased by CU-MARK in January 1995 from Waiting for Godot Books through the James F. and Agnes R. Robb Memorial Fund.

glyphglyphEmendations and textual notes:glyph


treated • treaited

myself. And • myself. —|And

imim- |