Buf. 30.th
Dear Redpath—
I may talk a little (only in New England) next fall, but all the chances are in favor of my not doing anything of the kind. We’ll see.
I suppose that article of mine on Rev. Sabine will be made to damage me a good deal, through the manipulations of these religious [editors. Do ]not you think so?1
I have g just received the enclosed from Cleveland (Herald.) You must alter the authorship of the other ones to “lec “reformed lecturESS”—be otherwise the whole thing will be saddled on to me by these fair [ f ]victims.2
I stumbled in awkwardly & unexpectedly enough [ or on ]Kate Field at a private house yesterday, [& ]introduction followed.3
I don’t know anything about the lecture-capacities of towns east of Nevada—never tried them.
Yrs
Mark
I hope to drop in on you in 2 or 3 weeks. months.
P. S. The Cleveland Herald wants the next one rushed along—send it to me.
[letter docketed:] boston lyceum bureau. redpath & fall. feb 6 1871 [and] L | [rule] [and] Mark Twain | Buffalo N.Y. Jan. 30 ’71 [and] boston lyceum bureau. redpath & fall. feb 20 1871
Explanatory Notes | Textual Commentary
It is almost fair and just to aver (although it is
profanity) that nine-tenths of all the kindness and forbearance and
Christian charity and generosity in the hearts of the American
people to-day, got there by being filtered down from their
fountain-head, the gospel of Christ, through
dramas and tragedies and comedies on the stage, and through the
despised novel and the Christmas story, and through the thousand
and one lessons, suggestions, and narratives of generous deeds
that stir the pulses, and exalt and augment the nobility of the
nation day by day from the teeming columns of ten thousand
newspapers, and not from the
drowsy pulpit! (SLC 1871, 320–21)
“NICE YOUNG MEN.”
I am forced, by the continued impertinent intermeddling of
unscrupulous so-called “Bureaux,” to announce
that I shall in future refuse to answer any letters or applications
which come to me through these obtrusive
“middle-men.” Committees must apply directly
to me, or be met with silence.
OLIVE LOGAN,
55 West Ninth-st., N. Y. City.
(Chicago Evening Post, 16 Dec
71, 4)
Miss Field delivered her lecture on Charles Dickens,
last evening, at St. James Hall, to a fair audience—to an
audience larger in fact than is often obtained by an independent
lecturer [that is, one not sponsored by the local lyceum
society]. Of the merits of the lecture we shall only say
that our criticism of it, if we undertook one, would hardly be as
unstinted praise as we have found lavished upon Miss
Field’s discourse in many of our exchanges.
(“Miss Kate Field’s Lecture,” 31
Jan 71, 4) Clemens may have written, or at least inspired these
remarks, for he was consistently contemptuous of Kate Field’s
platform abilities, even though he was not unsympathetic to her. In an
autobiographical sketch about his lecture days, written in 1898, he
recalled: Kate Field had made a wide spasmodic notoriety in
1867 by some letters which she sent from Boston—by
telegraph—to the Tribune about
Dickens’s readings there in the beginning of his
triumphant American tour. . . . By & by she went on the
platform; but two or three years had elapsed & her
subject—Dickens—had now lost its freshness
& its interest. For a while people went to see her, because of her name; but her lecture was
poor & her delivery repellantly artificial; consequently
when the ‸country’s‸ desire to look at her had
been appeased, the platform forsook her. She was a good creature, & the
acquisition of a perishable & fleeting notoriety was the
disaster of her life. (SLC 1898, 8–9)
Source text(s):
Previous publication:
L4, 322–324.
Provenance:bequeathed to MH in 1918 by Evert J. Wendell.
Emendations and textual notes:
editors. Do • editors.—|Do
f • [partly formed]
or on • orn
& • & &