Elmira, May 22.
Friend Bliss:
I have mislaid the letter you wrote [me ] the other day about House’s Japan book. I am anxious it should go to him. Will you make a copy of it & send to him? It is important that he should know what you said in it.1
Please telegraph me the numbers of ‸each of‸ my 3 books that have been sold. Want it for a biographical [notice. You ] You needn’t mention the names of the books, but just the number sold of each. I will know ‘tother from which by the varying number—or rather by your putting Innocents first, Roughing It next & Gilded Age last.2
All well here.
[bottom one-fifth of page cut away] 3
[letter docketed:] [and] [Samuel L. Clemens ] Elmira | N. Y. | May 22 ″74
Explanatory Notes | Textual Commentary
explaining all my ideas of getting new material in
Formosa, and my belief that it would add to the value of the book,
although a postponement would be necessary. I asked for his opinion
about the matter, but have never heard from him since. I
can’t tell whether to think he didn’t like the
postponement, and concluded to push the whole affair aside, or that
he may have written and I not have received his letter.
I’m all uncertain in the business, and have shut off
work, because I can’t go ahead in such a state of
indecision. Have you heard him say anything about it? I was very
explicit, and of course thought I was quite convincing, but perhaps
I wasn’t, and it may be that Bliss took a totally
different view from mine, and got mad because I wanted to extend the
contract time. Anyway, I am all in the dark at present. You don’t say anything on the
subject, either. Can it be possible that all
my letters failed to reach their destination? I hardly think that,
since those I sent to the N.Y. Herald were all, or nearly all
published. I do wish I could get some word about it, for I am
completely at a loss and at a standstill. (CU-MARK) For further details of House’s planned book
and his Herald coverage of Japanese activities in
Formosa, see 10 Apr 75 to Bliss, n. 1, and 17 Nov 75 to Bennett,
n. 1.
During the five years which have elapsed since the
issue of “The Innocents Abroad,” the aggregate
sale of our author’s works has reached two hundred and
forty-one thousand copies, representing a money-value of nine
hundred and fifty thousand dollars. Though a large sale is by no
means the only or even the best measure of literary excellence, the
above-mentioned fact is so remarkable as to be almost unparalleled.
(Ferris, 17) Also pending was an update of the entry for Clemens that
had appeared in the eighth edition of Men of the Time:
A Dictionary of Contemporaries, issued by his English
publishers, George Routledge and Sons, in 1872 (L5, 161 n. 2). Clemens’s entry in the ninth edition,
published in 1875, was thoroughly revised. It discussed both Innocents and Roughing It,
although it gave no sales figures. It did not mention The Gilded Age, reporting instead on the dramatic version of
it that Clemens was still writing at this time: “In 1874 he
produced in New York a comedy, ‘The Golden Age,’
which had a remarkable success” (Men of the Time: 1872, 227;
1875, 249; APC 1866–79, 45, 102, 194, 195, 203,
211; “Statement of Sales of Gilded Age,” in Bliss
to Warner, 12 Mar 74, CtHT-W).
Source text(s):
Previous publication:
L6, 152–153.
Provenance:The Morse Collection was donated in 1942 by Walter F. Frear.
Emendations and textual notes:
me • me| me
notice. You • notice.—|You
Samuel L. Clemens • [erased; very faint]