Saturday.
Livy darling, we had a royal time till midnight at Howells’ last night.1 Howells dines with us tonight2 & we lunch with him Monday.3 This hakky is for the Modoc with my great love. I bought it for 10 cents at Newton, eleven miles out of Hartford.4 You had a sentence in your letter that all the culture & all the genius & all the practice in the world could not improve. It was admirable.5 With all my heart,
Yours,
Saml
Explanatory Notes
We got ready as soon as we could (our baggage had
been forwarded) and reached Howells’ at about 9
o’clock. Found a party there. I talked with Miss
Longfellow, for one. Saw Miss Hawthorne, also John Fiske. Also
Larkin G. Mead the sculptor (Howells’ bro-in-law) and his
wife. Found our little Susie’s photograph (the one
presented them by Susie Warner) one of their parlor ornaments. Got back to Young’s at 1
o’clock and went joyfully to bed. (Twichell, 1:19–20) Nathaniel Hawthorne’s daughter Rose
(1851–1926), who had married George Parsons Lathrop in 1871,
attended Howells’s party. It has not been determined which of
Longfellow’s daughters, Alice Mary (1850–1928),
Edith (1853–1915), or Annie Allegra (1855–1934),
was present. Philosopher John Fiske (1842–1901) was at that
time an assistant librarian at Harvard. Larkin G. Mead, Jr.
(1835–1910), was Elinor Mead Howells’s brother; he
had married Marietta di Benvenuti, of Venice, in 1866. Susan Lee
Twichell was four years old (Mellow, 239, 363, 586–87; Wagenknecht, 7, 212 n. 4; Howells 1979 [bib00431], 464, 467; L4, 238 n. 3 top). In a letter of 15
November 1874 Howells gave his father a description of Clemens on the
night of the party: “I never saw a more used-up, hungrier
man, than Clemens. It was something fearful to see him eat escalloped
oysters” (Howells 1979 [bib01004], 76 n. 3). And in 1910, in
“My Mark Twain,” he recalled: One night, while we were giving a party, he suddenly
stormed in with a friend of his and mine, Mr. Twichell, and
immediately began to eat and drink of our supper, for they had come
straight to our house from walking to Boston, or so great a part of
the way as to be ahungered and athirst. I can see him now as he
stood up in the midst of our friends, with his head thrown back, and
in his hand a dish of those escalloped oysters without which no
party in Cambridge was really a party, exulting in the tale of his
adventure, which had abounded in the most original characters and
amusing incidents at every mile of their progress. They had broken
their journey with a night’s rest, and they had helped
themselves lavishly out by rail in the last half; but still it had
been a mighty walk to do in two days. (Howells 1968, 284)
MARK TWAIN.
————
HIS RECENT WALKING FEAT.
————
He Tells a Times Reporter All About
It—The Beauty of Getting Away from
Railroads—What He Intends Doing Another Year.
————
[written for the boston
times.]
As most readers of the Times are aware, Mark Twain, known to a select circle of
relatives and friends as Mr. Samuel L. Clemens, recently undertook,
in company with his friend and pastor, Rev. J. H. Twitchell, to
achieve pedestrian fame. He started with Mr. Twitchell from Hartford
at 9 A. M. on Thur[s]day last, intending to reach Boston
by way of the old turnpike road yesterday. On Friday they hitched on
to a train and reached Boston at seven o’clock in the
evening, ahead of the time in which they had proposed to do the
journey. Feeling certain that the public would like to know from the
adventurous Twain’s own lips the details of the journey,
a Times reporter called on him at
Young’s Hotel, last evening, and enjoyed the following
conversation with him: Reporter—Mr. Clemens, the readers of
our paper would like to learn the particulars of your journey from
Hartford. Mark Twain—Certainly, sir. We
originally intended to leave Hartford on Monday morning and take a
week to walk to Boston, just loafing along the road, and walking,
perhaps, fifteen or eighteen miles a day, just for the sake of
talking and swopping experiences, and inventing fresh ones, and
simply enjoying ourselves in that way, without caring whether we saw
anything or found out anything on the road or not. We were to make
this journey simply for the sake of talking. But then our plan was
interrupted by Mr. Twitchell having to go to a Congregational
Conference of Ministers at Bridgeport, so we could not start till
Thursday. We thought we would simply do two days, walking along
comfortably all the time, and bringing on night just where it chose
to come, and about noon, Saturday, we would get a train that would
take us into Boston. We got so ambitious, however, the first day,
and felt so lively that we walked twenty-eight miles. Reporter—Did you experience any
fatigue at the end of that day’s work? Twain—Well, at the end of that day
when we stopped for the night I didn’t feel fatigued, and
I had no desire to go to bed, but I had a pain through my left knee
which interrupted my conversation with lockjaw every now and then.
The next day at twelve past five we started again, intending to do
forty miles that day, believing we could still make Boston in three
days. But we didn’t make the forty miles. Finding it took
me three or four hours to walk seven miles, as my knee was still so
stiff that it was like walking on stilts—or, if you can
imagine such a thing, it was [as] though I had wooden
legs with pains in them—we just got a team and drove to
the nearest railway station, hitched on, and came up here. Reporter—You could doubtless have
accomplished the journey on foot, sir? Twain—Oh, our experience undoubtedly
demonstrates the possibility of walking. By and by, when we get an
entire week to make this pedestrian excursion, we mean to make it. Reporter—When you renew the
experiment, do you intend to follow any different plan? Twain—No, I would just follow the old
Hartford and Boston stage-road of old times. It takes you through a
lot of quiet, pleasant villages, away from the railroads, over a
road that now has so little travel that you don’t have to
be skipping out into the bushes every moment to let a wagon go by,
because no wagon goes by. And then you see you can talk all you
want, with nobody to listen to what you say; you can have it all to
yourself, and express your opinions pretty freely. Reporter—Were the opportunities for
refreshment by the way good? Twain—Well, I suppose pretty fair,
especially if you are walking all day. Reporter—Do you intend to lecture in
Boston, now you are here? Twain—No, not at all. I simply intend
to go back home again. I shall lie over Sunday to rest, and let Mr.
Twitchell have a chance to preach at Newton. You may as well say
that we expect hereafter to walk up to Boston, and after we get into
the habit of this sort of thing, we may extend it perhaps to New
Orleans or San Francisco. Really, though, there was no intention on
our part to excite anybody’s envy or make Mr. Weston feel
badly, for we were not preparing for a big walk so much as for a
delightful walk. Mark was holding his napkin between his
forefinger and thumb all the time, standing in the doorway of Room
9, in which a select party of his friends were impatiently awaiting
his return to the table, and so our reporter abstained from asking
him, as he intended and ought to have done, as to whether a
bottle-holder would not be a good feature in his next trip and
various other important queries. Thanking him he accordingly
withdrew. (Twichell, 1:21–23, including the
clipping transcribed here, which was probably from the Boston Times of 16 Nov 74) From Monday, 9 November, through Wednesday, 11 November,
Twichell had attended the annual meeting of the general conference of
the Congregational churches of Connecticut in Bridgeport. On Sunday, 15
November, he walked nine miles from Boston to Newton Highlands, where he
preached “both forenoon and evening” and then
stayed overnight at the home of the local pastor, the Reverend S. H.
Dana. Edward Payson Weston was a well-known long-distance walker (Twichell, 1:12, 23–24;
“Congregational Conference,” Hartford Courant, 10 Nov 74, 2; L3, 469 n. 8).
“As we passed out,” he writes, “Mr.
A. joined the party, and while the rest of us were chatting briskly
about the incidents of the meeting, Mr. Clemens was silent until we
got up into Beacon Street, when he spoke out in a serious way,
saying, as nearly as I can recall his language: ‘Well,
that was an extraordinary meeting! How that chap did draw on the
blackboard! I never saw anything like that. I’m sorry we
had to come away, for I was mightily interested in the talk going
on, and wanted to say something myself. When Mrs. Sargent asked me
if I would speak, I did n’t want to do it at all, but I
thought it would n’t be polite to decline. I did
n’t care much about evolution, but when they struck the
doctrine of metempsychosis, I got interested. That doctrine accounts
for me: I knew there was something the matter, but never knew what
it was before. It’s the passing off on a man of an old,
damaged, second-hand soul that makes all the
trouble.’” (Sargent, 187) According to Twichell’s journal, they then
went to Howells at 2 o’clock to
lunch—disgracefully tardy—a most delightful
afternoon. Late in the afternoon called on Prof. Lowell with
Howells, and staid a half-hour, which was mostly occupied with talk
about Beecher. Lowell looked much as I had expected him to. But Dr. Holmes, to whom Mark introduced me on the
street Saturday, looked older than I had imagined. We left Howells’ finally at 6
o’clock—looked at Harvard Memorial Hall during
the tea hour, (Howells going so far with us) then back to Boston and
by the 9 o’clock train to Hartford after on some accounts
the most pleasant experience of my life. (Twichell, 1:24–26) The “talk about Beecher” doubtless
concerned his alleged adultery with Elizabeth Tilton (see 29?
July 74 to Twichell, n. 2). Clemens and Twichell reached
Hartford at midnight (Hart 1983, 623; Boston Directory 1874, 66,
67, 805, 1016).
Source text(s):
Previous publication:
L6, 282–285; MFMT, 67, brief excerpt; LLMT, 193.
Provenance:see Samossoud Collection in Description of Provenance.