Jump to Content

Add to My Citations To Frank Fuller
6 September 1874 • Elmira, N.Y.
(Transcript and MS: WU and CLjC, UCCL 01124)
Click to add citation to My Citations.

Elmira Sept 6

Dear Frank:1

His claim is a distinction without a difference. If the English idea had been already known to our Patent officers, he never would have been granted a patent. The English plan is worth two of it anyway.

Ordinarily I would be willing to chance something maybe, on this thing but I can’t, this year, for our house is costing three times as much as we had intended it should, [& ] so I naturally don’t feel able to speculate in anything. Your idea is the only sound one—to get it adopted by the government. If he would give the refusal for a year at a stipulated price, it would be worth while to tackle the government—but to buy it & then do the tackling would be bad wisdom.

I could suggest an improvement on this invention that would make Mr Fletcher feel mighty bad. But we’ll be in New York from the 10th to the 15th (at the St Nicholas doubtless) & then we’ll talk.

Warm regards to you & yours

Ys Ever

Mark

altalt

Frank Fuller Esq
55 Liberty st.
New York [postmarked:] elmira n. y.[sep 7 white diamondwhite diamondwhite diamond] [docketed by Fuller:] Mark Twain

Explanatory Notes | Textual Commentary

Add to My Citations

Click to add citation to My Citations.
1 Fuller had written twice—on 21 August and on 3 September—since receiving Clemens’s letter of 8–10 July. In the first letter, he offered an investment opportunity (CU-MARK):
Click to add citation to My Citations.

Clemens was “a member of the Govment” briefly in late 1867, when he acted as secretary for Senator Stewart of Nevada. In “The Facts Concerning the Recent Resignation,” published in the New York Tribune on 27 December 1867, he claimed that the secretary of the treasury had called him an ass for suggesting that “a few conundrums distributed around through his Treasury report would help the sale of it” (SLC 1867; L2, 109–10 n. 2, 112, 139 n. 4). The creator of Fuller’s “letter envelope,” Addison C. Fletcher of New York City, had received United States patent number 127,330 on 28 May 1872 for his invention, a “letter-sheet blank, having its inner fold cut away or punctured at its end so that mucilage or other adhesive material applied to the corners of the outer fold or flap will seal both folds and the back together at one operation” (Official Gazette, 1:539). Fuller wanted Clemens to persuade his Hartford friend Marshall Jewell, former three-term governor of Connecticut, minister to Russia, and since 3 July the United States postmaster general appointee, to officially adopt it (L4, 396 n. 1; “The Postmaster Generalship,” New York Times, 4 July 74, 4). Clemens declined the offer, in a letter not known to survive, before 3 September, when Fuller wrote again. This time Fuller used one of Fletcher’s blanks and enclosed a letter, now lost, in which Fletcher, who was not coming easily to terms, apparently claimed his invention’s distinction from its English counterpart (CU-MARK):

Click to add citation to My Citations.

The “certain Brooklyn party” has not been identified.



glyphglyphSource text(s):glyph
Transcript, handwritten by Dana S. Ayer during the late 1890s or later, in the Rare Book Department, Memorial Library, University of Wisconsin, Madison (WU). MS, James S. Copley Library, La Jolla, California (CLjC), is copy-text for the envelope.

glyphglyphPrevious publication:glyph L6, 228–230.

glyphglyphProvenance:glyphsee Brownell Collection in Description of Provenance. The Ayer transcription was copied by a typist, and this typed transcription is also at WU. CLjC purchased the envelope in July 1966 as part of a Fuller collection; at that time it was paired with the MS for 24 Sept 68 to Fuller (UCCL 02753).

glyphglyphEmendations and textual notes:glyph


& • and [here and hereafter]

sep 7 white diamondwhite diamondwhite diamond[swhite diamondp] 7 [white diamondwhite diamondwhite diamond] [badly inked; number of characters doubtful]