9 April 1874 • Hartford, Conn.
(Goodspeed’s Book Shop: 1927?, lot 4633; 1930, lot 28, UCCL 01073)
Dear [Stillson—Will ] you please have all exchanges saved [& ] put by for me that contain that silly item that I have “received & paid the bill for a complimentary [supper given to me ]in [Hartford—? ] In confidence, I am bringing a libel suit & I want these papers as evidence. Don’t mention [it 1
. . . .
Mark].
Explanatory Notes | Textual Commentary
A paragraph something like the following, which
is from the New York Post, is going the
rounds of the papers: Mark Twain recently received and paid the bill
for a complimentary supper tendered him in Hartford. Mr. Clemens has not received nor paid for any
complimentary supper in Hartford. Where do
such absurdities originate? (“Personal,”
2)![]()
| P1 | Goodspeed’s Book Shop 1927?, lot 4633 |
| P2 | Goodspeed’s Book Shop 1930, lot 28 |
![]()
Previous publication:
L6, 102–103.
![]()
Provenance:
When offered for sale in 1924 the MS was part of the collection of William F.
Gable. Adopted readings followed by ‘(C)’ are
editorial emendations of the source readings.
![]()
Emendations, adopted readings, and textual notes:![]()
No copy-text. The text is based on two transcriptions, each of which derives independently from the MS:
Both P1 and P2 describe the MS as an “A.l.s. 2 pp. April 9, ’74,” and both texts are incomplete. A third text, AAA 1924, lot 532 (paraphrase and extract), while independently transcribed from the MS, provides no unique readings.
Apl. 9, ’74. (C) • April 9, ’74. [reported, not quoted] (P1,P2)
Stillson—Will (P1) • Stillson, Will (P2)
& (P2) • and [also at 102.14] (P1)
supper given to me (P2) • dinner (P1)
Hartford—? (C) • Hartford’? (P1); Hartford?’ (P2)
it | . . . . | Mark. (C) • it,” etc. Signed “Mark.” (P1); it,” etc., etc. Signed “Mark.” (P2)